Continuing source-based research · Museum of One
This programme follows the development of Post-Interpretive Criticism's vocabulary, distinctions, and qualifications across the published work. It examines how a concept is introduced, how its use changes, and how later arguments qualify earlier formulations.
pir-prj-xgd6wb9dAvailable public record: Living Lexicon · Doctrine, Foundational Essays & Investigations.
Status reviewed: 14 October 2026.
The Living Lexicon records the vocabulary used in the foundational essays and doctrine. A definition does not establish universal adoption or independent validation. Source-based research keeps a term attached to the work in which it is proposed and the argument through which its use is defended.
The current public programme record lists reference material and continuing source-based research, rather than a separate completed programme paper or book.
Status: Public reference resource
Dorian Vale
An existing lexicon used to trace the vocabulary and formulations of Post-Interpretive Criticism. Its availability is a public reference point, not evidence that its definitions are settled or independently validated.
Source-based research follows how terms are introduced, changed, defended, and qualified across the published work. The historical formulations remain attached to their sources rather than being silently replaced by later definitions.
The published vocabulary and continuing research remain distinct. Readers can compare earlier formulations with later qualifications without treating either as settled doctrine.
The early theoretical and doctrinal writings and the Living Lexicon preserve the initial vocabulary of Post-Interpretive Criticism. They provide dated sources for tracing subsequent qualifications and changes in the framework.
The inquiry asks which distinctions remain useful, which need revision, and how later claims relate to earlier formulations. A preserved definition is a source for examination rather than a requirement that subsequent research confirm it.
The first-edition Living Lexicon associates restraint with silence and withholding. Answerability, version 1.0 supplies a later qualification: explanatory language must be assessed through its function and evidential reach. A short account can conceal a necessary historical distinction; a longer account can state its limits precisely. The earlier formulation remains available beside this qualification.
In Research Working Paper No. 1, the account’s obligation to justify its claims is given a particular procedure. The proposition’s referent, meaning, scope, certainty and evidence are fixed before a challenge is assessed. Retention, limitation, revision and suspension describe possible responses. The historical cases make these choices available for scrutiny, while the programme’s next investigation identifies further tests.
Hauntmark Theory asks what critical language leaves behind. After the Interpretation Changes, version 1.0 examines a narrower documentary question: when does surviving language still authorize a judgment? The later study distinguishes correction, naming completion, circulation and renewed authority. The persistence of a trace alone cannot settle the last of these questions.
These three reading notes were added on 22 October 2026 from the linked public texts. They identify particular developments in Vale’s work; the original publications retain their wording, dates and qualifications.
Study plan: follow one concept across identified editions, recording each formulation, the argument supporting it, a documented objection or case that tests it, and any later qualification. The intended output is a short concept history with exact passages and unresolved alternatives. Dorian Vale is responsible for this source comparison.
Doctrine, Foundational Essays & Investigations → Research Programmes → Outputs and developments → Publications.
Browse Doctrine, Foundational Essays & Investigations · View the publication register