Choose an inquiry to explore its working papers, essays, dialogues and books. Each programme keeps its outputs beside the question that drives the work.
The diagrams are visual programme markers, not research findings. Output records state their actual status; published work remains in the Journal or Publications, linked from its programme.
Research infrastructure
The public programmes are supported by source registers, case studies, correspondence records, editorial review, and preservation work. Private drafts, correspondence and restricted records are not published here.
Research tools and experiments
Instruments and experimental protocols supporting the Methods programme. Eight documented tools and research workspaces examine evidence, curatorial decisions, critical language, viewing conditions, and relations between works. Their directory sets out the purpose, procedure, connection to PIC, and limits of each instrument.
Sources and case studies
Source registers preserve bibliographic context and distinctions between observation, interpretation, and evidence. Case studies and diagnostic reading resources make selected methods available for scrutiny; experimental indices remain proposals, not measures of aesthetic truth.
Authorship and conceptual contributions are recorded separately. Discussion does not establish collaboration or endorsement. Permission for a specified passage does not authorize release of an entire private exchange. Public records are presented according to their actual publication and permission status.
PIRR forms part of Museum of One's developing research infrastructure. It connects programme records with their sources, development histories and related work.
Each public programme record identifies the research question, form of work, responsible contributors, current stage and available material. Outputs and developments belong within that record, so a working paper or published exchange can be read in relation to the investigation that produced it.
PIRR project IDs identify registered programme records. PIRR programme references connect working research records with their corresponding public accounts. These are distinct reference types and are labelled accordingly; an identifier is not evidence that an inquiry is complete or that its claims have been validated.
The registry links doctrine and foundational essays, current investigations and their outputs, while recording the status of each. Individual texts retain their historical context. Current programmes may test, revise, or depart from those formulations. Publications retain their own DOIs, ISBNs, editions, and repository records.
A programme’s stage and an output’s publication status are separate. Continuing research can produce published work, while a programme in development may contain a working paper or manuscript that has not been released. Links lead to available public records rather than implying access to private drafts.
The registry is part of Museum of One’s own research infrastructure. It does not confer external accreditation, peer-review status, institutional partnership, or a participant’s endorsement. Source histories and correspondence remain subject to attribution and permission; recording an exchange does not authorize publishing it.
Follow the work
Enter a programme above, follow its published work or dialogue, and return through the programme link. The full texts retain their own references, arguments, and qualifications.
Each programme records a question, responsibility, current work, outputs, and continuing developments. The Development of the inquiry section connects its earlier sources to the questions now being investigated. Published outputs link back to their relevant programmes and provide a research summary, scope, publication history, and citation downloads.