Museum of One / Institutional website ↗Archive registry / Item-level records
Digital Archive LibraryMuseum of One / Source-linked catalogue
Website capture / web-6af28362df1a1a0001408250

Titles, Dates, and Reconstructed Works: Four Documentary Histories of Korean Experimental Art

Four case studies in Korean art history trace how titles, dates and later reconstructions shape artwork identity in the records for Kim Yong-Ik, Park Suk-won, Lee Kang-so and Kim Kulim.

Canonical website source ↗ · All website captures · Original content HTML ↓

Credited website creators

Dorian Vale (Credited website author)

Rights and access

This is a stored copy of a public website publication, captured under the website owner’s archive instruction. Original source rights, image credits, citations and third-party exclusions remain applicable. Public access does not grant a new licence. External embeds and unpreserved files are explicitly identified below. Interactive source is retained as an inert HTML download; a live software environment is not guaranteed.

Published content

Working paper · Version 1.0 · 10 November 2026 · 16 pages · 21 references

By Dorian Vale · Museum of One

Canonical DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24095953. Prepared for scholarly circulation. This working paper has not undergone independent peer review.

Abstract

A work can retain its title and historical date even when its materials, arrangement, or means of presentation have changed. This working paper examines four Korean archival and museum cases: Kim Yong-Ik’s Plane Object photographs and the history of “plain” and “place”; the differing production years assigned to Park Suk-won’s Jeok–Eungnyeok; the 1975 historical reference and 2016 materials of Lee Kang-so’s Untitled 75031; and Kim Kulim’s Mediator, used by the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea, to exemplify compound dating. MMCA’s acquisition narrative and publication guidance acknowledge remaking as part of collecting an experimental past. The paper reads that institutional practice alongside scholarship on the relations among images, material traces, and artwork identity. Aga Wielocha’s discussion of Danh Vo’s chandeliers provides a particularly revealing comparison: a title can date an object’s removal and transformation into art rather than its fabrication, just as a museum’s leading year can identify an earlier work rather than the age of its present components. These different histories require the event dated by each title or caption to remain explicit. Neither artist authorisation nor institutional recognition settles every claim about an earlier condition. The paper credits the overlapping demonstrations in the author’s Relational Archival Investigation papers and develops their implications for collecting, editorial preference, and historical inference. Its contribution is a comparative account of how names and dates sustain continuity without making the evidence for that continuity interchangeable.

Four documentary histories

  • Kim Yong-Ik (김용익). Plane Object / Flat Object (평면 오브제). SeMA’s portfolio descriptions distinguish the titles attached to images and Kim’s recollection of “plain” and “place.” A shared series title cannot identify an individual work.
  • Park Suk-won (박석원). Jeok–Eungnyeok (적-응력). The annual report and collection entry assign different leading years. The work’s remaking is documented. The reason for the discrepancy remains open.
  • Lee Kang-so (이강소). Untitled 75031 (무제 75031). The record distinguishes a 1975 historical reference from printing and remaking in 2016. The acquisition narrative discusses Painting–78–1. The 1976 Untitled paintings belong to a separate comparison.
  • Kim Kulim (김구림). Mediator (매개항). MMCA’s publication guide uses this work to explain how a compound date preserves a historical reference while specifying later material production.

Limits of the evidence

The study is based on documentary sources. The physical artworks, original photographic versos, complete 1978 printing proofs, and object-specific acquisition and conservation dossiers remain unexamined. The two published dates for Park’s work establish a discrepancy. The date of any catalogue amendment and the original year remain open. Jung Eun Young is cited through the published abstracts. Ryu Ji-yeon and Kaeun Park were consulted in full. The selected cases support case-specific findings about museum records and artwork identity.

Relationship to Relational Archival Investigation

The author’s RAI working paper and supplements already compare the naming evidence and Park’s published date discrepancy. They also establish why a series title cannot identify an individual Kim work and why Lee’s eight- and ten-photograph accounts cannot establish a sequence of additions. This paper develops those results through a sustained comparison of MMCA’s acquisition narrative, its dating convention and Mediator, alongside expanded Kim evidence and engagement with Ryu Ji-yeon and Aga Wielocha. The bibliography identifies the November 2026 RAI releases and the exact OSF files consulted.

한국어 연구 개요

이 워킹페이퍼는 김용익, 박석원, 이강소, 김구림의 작품에 관한 기록을 비교한다. 작품명과 제작연도가 작품의 동일성을 유지하는 방식과, 과거의 재료·전시·행위를 뒷받침하는 증거를 구분한다. 재제작 연도, 사진의 촬영 장소, 제목의 변형과 미술관의 표기 관행을 각각의 출처에 따라 검토하며, 네 사례를 한국미술 전체의 일반적 경향으로 확대하지 않는다.

Evidence and source access

These links lead to the institutions that hold or publish the records. The manuscript provides a pinpoint source register and 21 references. Reuse terms are set by each rights holder.

Companion study. When Documentation Becomes the Work. Browse Museum of One Research Working Papers.

Cite this working paper

Vale, Dorian. 2026. Titles, Dates, and Reconstructed Works: Four Documentary Histories of Korean Experimental Art. Working paper, version 1.0. Museum of One. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24095953

© 2026 Dorian Vale · Museum of One. In Copyright.

Repository copies and citation exports

Use the Zenodo DOI to cite this edition. The other records provide additional access to the working paper.

Zenodo · Knowledge Commons Works · Open Science Framework · Internet Archive · Research Catalogue · PhilArchive · Academia.edu· HAL

Files, images and media

  • Downloadlocal archival file · availablePublic site-uploaded asset captured under the site owner’s archive instruction. Original rights, credits and third-party exceptions remain applicable; no new licence is granted.309812 bytes · SHA-256 69ee1b25702685db6ffd43557e40b66d1ab28757c41690455d601d2cd2131b60
  • 2017092003532066115519.pdfexternal link only · not_checkedThird-party or unreviewed reuse rights; no local preservation claim.
  • MMCA%20Guide%20to%20Publication_20200806.pdfexternal link only · not_checkedThird-party or unreviewed reuse rights; no local preservation claim.
  • 20130125124036.pdfexternal link only · not_checkedThird-party or unreviewed reuse rights; no local preservation claim.

Source-declared metadata

Transcribed declarations retain their source scope. Identifiers are not promoted to independently verified edition assignments.

Source content SHA-256: de74a1e25f522fc523d13abd87e05eeb39dbc3328abdde6362d6f6a4484024cb

Your research desk

The reading list

Keep a small shelf of records to return to. Saved in this browser; no account or synchronization.

Select two or three saved records to compare editions, identifiers, rights, and research context.

Side by side

Compare the records

Publication cover